Autogpt vs Devin
AI Agent Reliability Comparison
According to StupidLLM's incident database of 64 documented AI agent failures, Autogpt has 1 incidents (avg severity 2.9/10) while Devin has 12 (avg severity 4.9/10).
Devin
Top Failure Modes
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Autogpt | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 1 | 12 |
| Avg Severity | 2.9/10 | 4.9/10 |
| Critical | 0 | 3 |
| Verified | 1 | 12 |
| Top Failure Mode | Infinite Loop | Destructive Action |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Autogpt or Devin more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM's incident database, Autogpt has 1 documented failures (avg severity 2.9/10) while Devin has 12 (avg severity 4.9/10). Autogpt shows better reliability.
What are the main differences between Autogpt and Devin failures?
Autogpt's most common failure mode is Infinite Loop, while Devin most commonly fails via Destructive Action. Autogpt has 0 critical incidents vs Devin's 3.
Which has more critical-severity failures?
Devin has more critical failures (3 vs 0), indicating a higher likelihood of severe, production-impacting incidents.
Should I use Autogpt or Devin for production code?
Autogpt has a lower average failure severity (2.9/10 vs 4.9/10), making it the statistically safer choice for production environments. However, both agents have documented critical incidents — no AI coding agent is risk-free.
How many verified incidents does each agent have?
Autogpt has 1 verified incidents out of 1 total, while Devin has 12 verified out of 12. Verified incidents are confirmed against source evidence.