Is Claude Code or Gemini CLI more reliable?

Based on StupidLLM's incident database, Claude Code has 49 documented failures (avg severity 7.1/10) while Gemini CLI has 6 (avg severity 7.7/10). Claude Code shows better reliability.

What are the main differences between Claude Code and Gemini CLI failures?

Claude Code's most common failure mode is Destructive Action, while Gemini CLI most commonly fails via Destructive Action. Claude Code has 11 critical incidents vs Gemini CLI's 3.

Which has more critical-severity failures?

Claude Code has more critical failures (11 vs 3), indicating a higher likelihood of severe, production-impacting incidents.

Should I use Claude Code or Gemini CLI for production code?

Claude Code has a lower average failure severity (7.1/10 vs 7.7/10), making it the statistically safer choice for production environments. However, both agents have documented critical incidents — no AI coding agent is risk-free.

How many verified incidents does each agent have?

Claude Code has 46 verified incidents out of 49 total, while Gemini CLI has 6 verified out of 6. Verified incidents are confirmed against source evidence.

Head to head

Claude Code vs Gemini CLI

Comparing 49 documented Claude Code incidents against 6 for Gemini CLI.

Full Claude Codereport →Full Gemini CLIreport →

Verdict

Claude Code has the lower average failure severity (7.1/10 vs 7.7/10), making it the statistically safer choice of the two — though both agents have documented critical incidents.