Is Cursor or Gemini CLI more reliable?

Based on StupidLLM's incident database, Cursor has 4 documented failures (avg severity 8.2/10) while Gemini CLI has 6 (avg severity 7.7/10). Gemini CLI shows better reliability.

What are the main differences between Cursor and Gemini CLI failures?

Cursor's most common failure mode is Security Vulnerability, while Gemini CLI most commonly fails via Destructive Action. Cursor has 3 critical incidents vs Gemini CLI's 3.

Which has more critical-severity failures?

Both Cursor and Gemini CLI have 3 critical-severity incidents.

Should I use Cursor or Gemini CLI for production code?

Gemini CLI has a lower average failure severity (7.7/10 vs 8.2/10), making it the statistically safer choice for production environments. However, both agents have documented critical incidents — no AI coding agent is risk-free.

How many verified incidents does each agent have?

Cursor has 4 verified incidents out of 4 total, while Gemini CLI has 6 verified out of 6. Verified incidents are confirmed against source evidence.

Head to head

Cursor vs Gemini CLI

Comparing 4 documented Cursor incidents against 6 for Gemini CLI.

Full Cursorreport →Full Gemini CLIreport →

Verdict

Gemini CLI has the lower average failure severity (7.7/10 vs 8.2/10), making it the statistically safer choice of the two — though both agents have documented critical incidents.