Devin vs Gemini Cli
AI Agent Reliability Comparison
According to StupidLLM's incident database of 64 documented AI agent failures, Devin has 12 incidents (avg severity 4.9/10) while Gemini Cli has 3 (avg severity 10.0/10).
Devin
Top Failure Modes
Gemini Cli
Top Failure Modes
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Devin | Gemini Cli |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 12 | 3 |
| Avg Severity | 4.9/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Critical | 3 | 3 |
| Verified | 12 | 3 |
| Top Failure Mode | Destructive Action | Security Vulnerability |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Devin or Gemini Cli more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM's incident database, Devin has 12 documented failures (avg severity 4.9/10) while Gemini Cli has 3 (avg severity 10.0/10). Devin shows better reliability.
What are the main differences between Devin and Gemini Cli failures?
Devin's most common failure mode is Destructive Action, while Gemini Cli most commonly fails via Security Vulnerability. Devin has 3 critical incidents vs Gemini Cli's 3.
Which has more critical-severity failures?
Both Devin and Gemini Cli have 3 critical-severity incidents.
Should I use Devin or Gemini Cli for production code?
Devin has a lower average failure severity (4.9/10 vs 10.0/10), making it the statistically safer choice for production environments. However, both agents have documented critical incidents — no AI coding agent is risk-free.
How many verified incidents does each agent have?
Devin has 12 verified incidents out of 12 total, while Gemini Cli has 3 verified out of 3. Verified incidents are confirmed against source evidence.