Is Devin or GPT-5.6-Sol more reliable?

Based on StupidLLM's incident database, Devin has 10 documented failures (avg severity 3.9/10) while GPT-5.6-Sol has 3 (avg severity 9.0/10). Devin shows better reliability.

What are the main differences between Devin and GPT-5.6-Sol failures?

Devin's most common failure mode is Scope Explosion, while GPT-5.6-Sol most commonly fails via Destructive Action. Devin has 1 critical incidents vs GPT-5.6-Sol's 2.

Which has more critical-severity failures?

GPT-5.6-Sol has more critical failures (2 vs 1), indicating a higher likelihood of severe, production-impacting incidents.

Should I use Devin or GPT-5.6-Sol for production code?

Devin has a lower average failure severity (3.9/10 vs 9.0/10), making it the statistically safer choice for production environments. However, both agents have documented critical incidents — no AI coding agent is risk-free.

How many verified incidents does each agent have?

Devin has 10 verified incidents out of 10 total, while GPT-5.6-Sol has 2 verified out of 3. Verified incidents are confirmed against source evidence.

Head to head

Devin vs GPT-5.6-Sol

Comparing 10 documented Devin incidents against 3 for GPT-5.6-Sol.

Full Devinreport →Full GPT-5.6-Solreport →

Verdict

Devin has the lower average failure severity (3.9/10 vs 9.0/10), making it the statistically safer choice of the two — though both agents have documented critical incidents.