Devin vs Gpt Sol
AI Agent Reliability Comparison
According to StupidLLM's incident database of 64 documented AI agent failures, Devin has 12 incidents (avg severity 4.9/10) while Gpt Sol has 1 (avg severity 10.0/10).
Devin
Top Failure Modes
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Devin | Gpt Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 12 | 1 |
| Avg Severity | 4.9/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Critical | 3 | 1 |
| Verified | 12 | 1 |
| Top Failure Mode | Destructive Action | Destructive Action |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Devin or Gpt Sol more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM's incident database, Devin has 12 documented failures (avg severity 4.9/10) while Gpt Sol has 1 (avg severity 10.0/10). Devin shows better reliability.
What are the main differences between Devin and Gpt Sol failures?
Devin's most common failure mode is Destructive Action, while Gpt Sol most commonly fails via Destructive Action. Devin has 3 critical incidents vs Gpt Sol's 1.
Which has more critical-severity failures?
Devin has more critical failures (3 vs 1), indicating a higher likelihood of severe, production-impacting incidents.
Should I use Devin or Gpt Sol for production code?
Devin has a lower average failure severity (4.9/10 vs 10.0/10), making it the statistically safer choice for production environments. However, both agents have documented critical incidents — no AI coding agent is risk-free.
How many verified incidents does each agent have?
Devin has 12 verified incidents out of 12 total, while Gpt Sol has 1 verified out of 1. Verified incidents are confirmed against source evidence.