Devin vs Replit
AI Agent Reliability Comparison
According to StupidLLM's incident database of 64 documented AI agent failures, Devin has 12 incidents (avg severity 4.9/10) while Replit has 1 (avg severity 10.0/10).
Devin
Top Failure Modes
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Devin | Replit |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 12 | 1 |
| Avg Severity | 4.9/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Critical | 3 | 1 |
| Verified | 12 | 1 |
| Top Failure Mode | Destructive Action | Destructive Action |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Devin or Replit more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM's incident database, Devin has 12 documented failures (avg severity 4.9/10) while Replit has 1 (avg severity 10.0/10). Devin shows better reliability.
What are the main differences between Devin and Replit failures?
Devin's most common failure mode is Destructive Action, while Replit most commonly fails via Destructive Action. Devin has 3 critical incidents vs Replit's 1.
Which has more critical-severity failures?
Devin has more critical failures (3 vs 1), indicating a higher likelihood of severe, production-impacting incidents.
Should I use Devin or Replit for production code?
Devin has a lower average failure severity (4.9/10 vs 10.0/10), making it the statistically safer choice for production environments. However, both agents have documented critical incidents — no AI coding agent is risk-free.
How many verified incidents does each agent have?
Devin has 12 verified incidents out of 12 total, while Replit has 1 verified out of 1. Verified incidents are confirmed against source evidence.