Devin vs Sakana Ai Scientist
AI Agent Reliability Comparison
According to StupidLLM's incident database of 64 documented AI agent failures, Devin has 12 incidents (avg severity 4.9/10) while Sakana Ai Scientist has 1 (avg severity 2.0/10).
Devin
Top Failure Modes
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Devin | Sakana Ai Scientist |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 12 | 1 |
| Avg Severity | 4.9/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Critical | 3 | 0 |
| Verified | 12 | 1 |
| Top Failure Mode | Destructive Action | Ignored Instructions |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Devin or Sakana Ai Scientist more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM's incident database, Devin has 12 documented failures (avg severity 4.9/10) while Sakana Ai Scientist has 1 (avg severity 2.0/10). Sakana Ai Scientist shows better reliability.
What are the main differences between Devin and Sakana Ai Scientist failures?
Devin's most common failure mode is Destructive Action, while Sakana Ai Scientist most commonly fails via Ignored Instructions. Devin has 3 critical incidents vs Sakana Ai Scientist's 0.
Which has more critical-severity failures?
Devin has more critical failures (3 vs 0), indicating a higher likelihood of severe, production-impacting incidents.
Should I use Devin or Sakana Ai Scientist for production code?
Sakana Ai Scientist has a lower average failure severity (2.0/10 vs 4.9/10), making it the statistically safer choice for production environments. However, both agents have documented critical incidents — no AI coding agent is risk-free.
How many verified incidents does each agent have?
Devin has 12 verified incidents out of 12 total, while Sakana Ai Scientist has 1 verified out of 1. Verified incidents are confirmed against source evidence.