Head to head
GPT-5.6-Sol vs Lovable
Comparing 3 documented GPT-5.6-Sol incidents against 3 for Lovable.
What these records show
GPT-5.6-Sol has the lower average severity among the incidents collected here (8.3 vs 8.7 for GPT-5.6-Sol and Lovable, from 3 and 3 incidents). These records can't establish which agent is safer: counts reflect how widely each is used and how often people report failures, not a failure rate.
| Metric | GPT-5.6-Sol | Lovable |
|---|---|---|
| Documented incidents | 3 | 3 |
| Average severity | 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Critical | 2 | 2 |
| High | 1 | 1 |
| Source checked | 2 | 1 |
Severity at a glance
GPT-5.6-Sol
8.3
high
Lovable
8.7
high
Failure modes
GPT-5.6-SolDistribution of failure modes across all documented incidents.
LovableDistribution of failure modes across all documented incidents.
The incidents behind these numbers
GPT-5.6-Sol
9.0OpenAI Codex running GPT-5.6-Sol deleted roughly 221 GB from a developer's home directory across several concurrent auto-approved sessions, with no sandbox denial logged for whatever performed the deletion (GitHub #42875)9.0GPT-5.6-Sol deleted developer's entire production database — first time it happened with that model7.0GPT-5.6-Sol 'accidentally deleted almost ALL' of a tester's Mac files during OpenAI's Ultra mode trial
Lovable
9.0A broken object-level authorization bug let any free Lovable account pull other users' source code, Supabase credentials and AI chat histories for 48 days before Lovable fixed it9.0Lovable-generated apps shipped without adequate Supabase row-level security, leaving databases readable and writable by anyone (CVE-2025-48757)8.0A security researcher found 16 vulnerabilities — including inverted access-control logic — in a Lovable-generated EdTech app, exposing 18,697 users' records and letting anyone delete accounts or grade exams