Manus vs Windsurf
AI Agent Reliability Comparison
According to StupidLLM's incident database of 64 documented AI agent failures, Manus has 1 incidents (avg severity 7.5/10) while Windsurf has 1 (avg severity 7.5/10).
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Manus | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Severity | 7.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Critical | 0 | 0 |
| Verified | 1 | 1 |
| Top Failure Mode | Security Vulnerability | Ignored Instructions |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Manus or Windsurf more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM's incident database, Manus has 1 documented failures (avg severity 7.5/10) while Windsurf has 1 (avg severity 7.5/10). Both agents show similar reliability profiles.
What are the main differences between Manus and Windsurf failures?
Manus's most common failure mode is Security Vulnerability, while Windsurf most commonly fails via Ignored Instructions. Manus has 0 critical incidents vs Windsurf's 0.
Which has more critical-severity failures?
Both Manus and Windsurf have 0 critical-severity incidents.
Should I use Manus or Windsurf for production code?
Both agents have similar severity profiles. Manus tends to fail via Security Vulnerability, while Windsurf fails more via Ignored Instructions. However, both agents have documented critical incidents — no AI coding agent is risk-free.
How many verified incidents does each agent have?
Manus has 1 verified incidents out of 1 total, while Windsurf has 1 verified out of 1. Verified incidents are confirmed against source evidence.